In 2011, British author E.L. James achieved notoriety by
writing the erotic novel ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’. Four years later it
became a hit movie, wowing the intended audience who lapped up the salacious
carry-on. Popularity breeds success and sequels which leads to ‘Fifty
Shades Darker’. The second in the ‘Fifty Shades’ trilogy serves up more of the
same. Those expecting undemanding naughtiness will see plenty.
Anyone expecting a good film will be disappointed as it’s as shoddily made as
its previous and very wicked entry.
Multi-millionaire Christian Grey (Jamie Dornan) is
miserable. Although having the world at his feet, he is despondent over
the recent departure of his muse Ana (Dakota Johnson). Wanting to resume
their very adult romance, he insists Ana sets the terms of their
relationship. Keen on the idea, Ana discovers more of the demons driving
Christian’s sexual desires. The past quickly catches up with them as
others threaten to spoil their union and dark activities.
‘Fifty Shades Darker’ is the type of movie that is critic
proof. Many expect hardened film reviewers to sharpen their talons at the
poor acting, script and direction. All of which can be found in the
latest ’50 Shades’ instalment. It’s easy railing the ridiculous story and
gaping plot-holes of which there are many. One could feel sorry for those
involved although remembering how much they are getting paid to do these films
lessens any remorseful feelings.
One of this sequel’s few saving graces is the expansion of
Grey’s world and exploration of his background. You understand why he
behaves in certain ways with his controlling nature alienating and arousing
those around him. Most readers would want to know about the lauded sex
scenes, which aren’t particularly erotic and stay within the film’s chaste
ratings guidelines. The acting is uniformly poor with the leads showing
little chemistry. Their co-stars’ lifeless performances make for
unintentionally hilarious viewing as they react to each plot twist with Botox-filled
emotions.
‘Fifty Shades Darker’ is pretty terrible but will make a
fortune no matter what critics say. It does have few good points over its
predecessor in terms of explaining character motivations. Otherwise it is business
as usual for a franchise intent on making as much money as possible until the
next flash in the pan novel phenomenon arrives.
Movie Review Rating out of 10: 2
Movie Review by Patrick Moore
Agree with Patrick's Movie Review? Then please use the
comment box.
Patrick Moore's Movie Review is an alternative look at movie
releases in Australia.
TRAILER
SOUNDTRACK
No comments:
Post a Comment